Orthodoxes-Forum.de

seit wann gibts ne ukrainisch orthodoxe kirche?

administrator hat geschrieben:Orthodoxe Priester gegen Antisemitismus
Wollen Streichung von Gottesmörder-Vorwürfen
Zwölf orthodoxe Priester haben ihre Kirchen am gestrigen Donnerstag dazu aufgefordert, ihre Jahrhunderte alte Position gegenüber den Juden und Israel zu revidieren und antisemitische Passagen aus der Liturgie zu streichen.

administrator hat geschrieben:@Sebastian

Du hast vollkommen Recht mit Deinen "Empörungen". Ich würde das auch nicht hier aufführen, wenn da nicht ein theol. Proffesor aus Moskau zittert wäre.
So gesehen, bin ich auch nur mehr als überrascht!

Nikolay Alexandroff hat geschrieben:I presume, that you are, probably, ill-informed in the matters concerning the Russian Orthodox Church, but this statement contains several inauthentic points. First of all there is no antisemitic liturgy in the Orthodox Church, and several sentences, mentioned in the statement are not more "antisemitic" than some passages from the New and Old Testament.
Second point is that Innokenty Pavlov for years wasn't a member of clergy of the Russian Orthodox Church - since 1995. In fact, he's a member of Greek-Catholic Church now, and a well-known fighter against Russian Orthodox Church. Just as Ioann Sviridov. They're both known to me and to many here as very unpleasant persons, by the public activity of theirs. Inadequate priest and monk, they amuse their vanity by escapades of all sorts, aiming to attract the attention of mass-media, and to get sums from Jewish organisations or from the Church in Need.
And Credo-Ru is known as a consistent in its policy secular and anti-Orthodox media. It is not worth any attention.

Radonezh[/url] (1997, russ. Original auf [url=http://www.or.ru/pressa/def.asp?path=12&m=1&n=40&a=662]Pravoslavie v Rossii hat geschrieben:The secular cleric Hegumen Innokenty Pavlov tried hard, exploiting the uninformed listener, to rehabilitate historically Metropolitan Isidor who participated in the union of Florence [15th century] and Antonin Granovsky, one of the leaders of renovationism. All church documents are constantly subjected to rude and unworthy comments of the hegumen who hates the Moscow patriarchate. The tone and form of his statements exceed the limits of decency. He likens the Church Slavonic language to criminal jargon and he calls the synodal translation of the Bible, in distinction from his own, "primitive."

ecumenizm.tripod.com hat geschrieben:From time to time the Moscow Patriarchate complains about the insufficiently protectionist Russian legislation dealing with Church matters and about the other parts of the "price that have to be paid for democracy". The authors of the "Appeal", however, speak of different matters. They cite numerous instances of direct assistance which the Moscow Patriarchate renders to Latin propaganda. They list ecumenical, or purely Catholic radio stations (Sophia, Blagovest /Glad Tidings/, and periodicals (Simvol, Istina i Zhizn', Novaia Evropa, Russkaia Mysl', /Symbol, Truth and Life, New Europe, Pensée Russe/, etc.) in which, along with Catholics tirelessly work as active contributors and sometimes even managers, such well-known members of the Moscow Patriarchate as archpriest Ioann Sviridov (contributor of the Department of Religious Education and Catechization of the MP), hegumen Innokenty Pavlov (Secretary of the Russian Biblical Society), priest A. Borisov (President of the same Society), Hegumen Ignaty (Krekshin) -- Secretary of the Synodal Commission for the Canonization of Saints of the ROC, hegumen Ioann Economtsev (Rector of the Orthodox University of St. John the Theologian), V. Nikitin (the Chief Editor of the official journal of the Department of Religious Education and Catechization Put' Pravoslaviia /Orthodox Way/, "priests journalists" G. Chistyakov and V. Lapshin, priest G. Ziablitsev (employee in the Department of Foreign Church Relations of the MP), who was appointed by his superior Metropolitan Kirill (Gundyaev) to the commission of the Catholic Church (!) for the canonization of one of their saints. The authors of the "Appeal" voice their indignation: "Such a scandalous fact -- i.e. participation in a heterodox enterprise of a canonical character -- has not been heard of since Latins fell away from the Church of Christ in 1054".

The persons mentioned above and many who remain unmentioned constantly address people through all mass media on behalf of the Orthodox Church, but speak in defense of the false teaching of Catholics, mock at patristic theology, and preach the imaginary identity of Orthodoxy with Papism. (JMP, 1968, No. 3, p. 53.)